The Growth Performance of African Catfish (<i>Clarias gariepinus</i>) Fed Commercially Prepared Imported Fish Feeds

Ajayi Olusina Tunde; Ojo Samson Oluwagbemiga; Adeleke Babatunde; Oluyisola Olufemi Oluseyi

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ijae.20160103.11

| Peer-Reviewed

The Growth Performance of African Catfish (Clarias gariepinus) Fed Commercially Prepared Imported Fish Feeds

Ajayi Olusina Tunde, Ojo Samson Oluwagbemiga, Adeleke Babatunde, Oluyisola Olufemi Oluseyi

Published in International Journal of Agricultural Economics (Volume 1, Issue 3)

Received: 7 July 2016 Accepted: 21 July 2016 Published: 6 August 2016

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

The experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of different imported fish feeds on the performance of juvenile African Catfish (Clarias gariepinus). A-13 week feeding trial was conducted using 225 juveniles which were randomly assigned to five treatment groups in 15 indoor plastic tanks at a stocking rate of 15 fish per tank and three (3) replicates per treatment. The fish were fed at 5% body weight, twice daily. The five treatments were Coppens (T₁), Aqua (T₂), Ranna (T₃), Pira (T₄) and Durante (T₅). Data for each parameter was subjected to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) while means of various results were compared at 5% level of significance. There were significant differences (P<0.05) in the weight gain among the treatments, with 54.07g and 21.73g for fish fed with Aqua and Rana respectively. Also, there were significant differences in the specific growth rate (SGR) as well as the protein efficiency ratio (PER) among the feed brands with Aqua and Rana having 2.79 and 1.97 as well as 1.49 and 1.12 respectively. In all the treatments, there were significant differences (P<0.05) in the survival rates of the fish with the highest percentage in fish fed with Coppens (93.33%). A kilogram of Aqua and Pira feeds each cost $1.75 while the estimated costs of feeding one individual fish to a weight gain of 1kg using the same feeds were $2.78 and $3.73 respectively. Although, from this feeding trial, it is expensive to raise a kilogramme of fish using Pira fish feed, but due to the high survival rate, it is recommended for catfish production. It is assumed that the biomass harvested will make up for the cost incurred.

Published in	International Journal of Agricultural Economics (Volume 1, Issue 3)
DOI	10.11648/j.ijae.20160103.11
Page(s)	57-61
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2016. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

African Catfish, Growth Performance, Imported Fish Feed

References

[1]	FAO 1997. “Review of the State of World Aquaculture.” FAO Fisheries Circular 15: 886.
[2]	Adewole, H. A. and Olaleye, V. F. 2014. “Growth Performance in Clarias gariepinus Fingerlings fed Blood Meal – Bovine Rumen Digesta Blend Diets”. Ife Journal of Science 16 (3).
[3]	Prein, M. and Ahmed, M. 2000. “Integration of Aquaculture into Smallholder Farming Systems for Improved Food Security and Household Nutrition.” Food and Nutrition Bulletin 21 (4): 466–71.
[4]	Dulvy, N and Allison, E. 2009. “A Place at the Table? Nature Reports.” Climate Change 3: 68–70.
[5]	FAO 2005. “Nutritional Elements of Fish.” Fisheries and Aquaculture Department. FAO, Rome, Italy.
[6]	Steven C. and Louis A. 2009. “Understanding Fish Nutrition, Feeds, and Feeding Communications and Marketing.” Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University: College of Agriculture and Life Sciences.
[7]	Umaru, J., Auta, J., Oniye, S. and Bolorunduro, P. 2016. “Growth and economic performance of African catfish, Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822) Juveniles to imported and local feeds in floating bamboo cages”. International Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Studies 4 (2): 221-226.
[8]	Jamu, D. M. and Ayinla, O. A. 2003. “Potential for the Development of Aquaculture in Africa.” NAGA 26 (3): 6–13.
[9]	FAO 2009a. “The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2008.” FAO, Rome, Italy. 176pp
[10]	Naylor, R. L., Hardy, R. W. and Bureau, D. P. 2009. “Feeding Aquaculture in an Era of Finite Resources.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106: 15103–10.
[11]	Ojutiku, R. O. 2008. “Comparative Survival and Growth Rate of Clarias gariepinus and Heteroclarias Hatchlings Fed Live and Frozen Daphnia.” Pakistan Journal of Nutrition 7 (4): 527–29.
[12]	Olagunju, F. I., Adesiyan, I. O. and Ezekiel, A. A. 2007. “Economic Viability of Catfish Production in Oyo State, Nigeria.” J. Hum. Ecol 21 (2): 121–24.
[13]	Eyo, V. 2001a. “Chemical Composition and Amino Acid Content of the Commonly Available Feedstuff in Nigeria. In: Fish Nutrition and Fish Feed Technology.” Proceedings of First National Symposium on Fish Nutrition and Fish Feed Technology NIOMR, Lagos.
[14]	Gabriel, U. U., Akinrotimi, O. A., Bekibele, D. O., Onunkwo, D. N. and Anyanwu, P. E. 2007. “Locally Produced Fish Feed: Potentials for Aquaculture Development in Sub-Saharan Africa.” African Journal of Agricultural Research 2 (7): 287–95.
[15]	Glencross, B., Booth, M. and Allan, G. 2007. “A Feed Is Only as Good as Its Ingredients: A Review of Ingredient Evaluation Strategies for Aquaculture Feeds.” Aquaculture Nutrition, 13: 17–34.
[16]	De-Silva S. S and Anderson T. A. 1995. “Fish Nutrition in Aquaculture.” Chapman and Hall. London., 319.
[17]	Shapawi, R., Mustafa, S. and Ng, W. 2011. “A Comparison of the Growth Performance and Body Composition of the Humpback Grouper Cromileptes altivelis Fed on Farm-Made Feeds, Commercial Feeds and Trash Fish.” Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 6 (5): 523–34.
[18]	Ekanem, A. P., Eyo, V. S., Obiekezie, A. I., Enin, U. I., and Udo, P. J. 2012. “A Comparative Study of the Growth Performance and Food Utilization of the African Catfish (Clarias gariepinus) Fed Unical Aqua Feed and Coppens Commercial Feed.” Journal of Marine Biology and Oceanography 1 (2): 1–6.
[19]	Anibeze, C. and Eze, A. 2000. “Growth Response of Two African Catfishes (Osteichthys: Clariidae) in Homestead Concrete Ponds.” Journal of Aquatic Sciences 15: 55–58.
[20]	Okoye, F. C., Eyo, A. A. and Aminu, N. G. 2001. “Growth of Tilapia Oreochromis niloticus Hybrid Fingerlings Fed Lipid-Based Diets. In: Fish Nutrition and Fish Feed Technology.” Proceedings of the First National Symposium of Fish Nutrition and Fish Feed Technology held at NIOMR, Lagos.
[21]	Madu, C. T. and Akilo, K. T. (2001). The use of live maggot and live tilapia fry as unconventional diets for Juveniles of the catfish Clarias anguillaris L. In: Fish Nutrition and Fish Feed Technology, A. A. Eyo (Ed.). Proceedings of the First National Symposium of Fish Nutrition and Fish Feed Technology held at NIOMR, Lagos. pp 75-83.
[22]	Sawhney S and Gandotra R. 2010a. “Effects of Photoperiod on Growth Feed Conversion, Efficiency and Survival of Fry and Fingerlings of Mahseer, Tor Putitora.” Israel Journal of Aquaculture - Bamidgeh 62 (4): 266–71.
[23]	Eyo, V. and Ekanem, A. 2011b. “Effect of Feeding Frequency on the Growth, Food Utilization and Survival of African Catfish (Clarias gariepinus) Using Locally Formulated Diet.” African Journal of Environment Pollution and Health 9: 11–16.
[24]	Mustapha, M., Oladokun, T., Salman, M., Adeniyi, I. and Ojo, D. 2014. “Does Light Duration (photoperiod) have an effect on the mortality and welfare of Cultured Oreochromis niloticus and Clarias gariepinus?” Turkish Journal of Zoology, 38: 1–5.
[25]	Henken AM, Machiels MAM, Deeker W and Hogendoorn H (1986). “The Effects of Dietary Protein and Energy Content on Growth Rate and Feed Utilization of the African Catfish, Clarias gariepinus (Burchell 1822).” Aquaculture 58: 55–74.
[26]	Giri, S. S., Sahoo, S. K., Sahu, A. K. and Meher, P. K. 2003. “Effect of Dietary Protein Level on Growth, Survival, Feed Utilization and Body Composition of Hybrid Catfish (Clarias batrachus and Clarias gariepinus).” Animal Feed Science Technology 104: 169–78.
[27]	Houlihan, D., Bouiard, T. and Jobling, M. 2001. “Food Intake in Fish”. USA: Iowa State University Press. Blackwell Science Ltd. 418pp.
[28]	Sawhney S and Gandotra R. 2010b. “Growth Response and Feed Conversion Efficiency of Tor Putitora (Ham.) Fry at Varying Dietary Protein Levels.” Pakistan Journal of Nutrition 9 (1): 86–90.
[29]	Otubusin, S. O. 2000. “The effects of different feedstuff on tilapia Oreochromis niloticus fry in floating net- hapa.” Nig. Jour. of Sci 34 (4): 377-379.
[30]	Osofero, S. A., Otubusin, S. O. and Daramola, J. A. 2007. “Effect of stocking density on Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus Linnaeus 1757) Growth and Survival in Bamboo- Net Cages Trial.” J. of Fi. Inter 2 (2): 182-185.
[31]	Agokei, E., Oparah, C., Aranyo, A. and Apapa, U. 2011a. “Growth of Clarias gariepinus Juveniles Fed Five Commercial Feed Continental.” Journal of Fish and Aquatic Science 5 (3): 1–5.
[32]	Adewolu, M. A., Ikenweiwe, N. B., and Mulero, S. M. 2010. “Evaluation of an Animal Protein Mixture as a Replacement for Fishmeal in Practical Diets for Fingerlings of Clarias gariepinus (Burchell 1822).”Israel Journal of Aquaculture-Bamidgeh 62 (4): 237–44.
[33]	Agbabiaka, L. A., Okorie, K. C., and Ezeafulukwe, C. F. 2013. “Plantain Peels as Dietary Supplement in Practical Diets for African Catfish (Clarias gariepinus Burchell 1822) Fingerlings.” Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America 4 (2): 155–59.
[34]	Ali, M. and Jauncey, K. 2004b. “Optimal Dietary Carbohydrate to Lipid Ratio in African Catfish Clarias gariepinus (Burchell 1822).” Aquaculture International 12 (2): 169–80.
[35]	Alam, M. K., Habib, M. A., and Tahmid, M. S. 2012. “A Survey on Commercial Fish Feed Used at Fulpur Area in Mymensingh District.” Journal of Bangladesh Agricultural University 10 (1): 175–78.
[36]	Fagbenro, O. A., Balogun, A. M. and Anyanwu, C. N. 1992. “Optimal dietary protein levels for Heterobranchus bidorsalis fingerlings fed compounded diets.” Isrseli J. of Aqua. Bami. 44 (3): 87-92.
[37]	Balogun, B. I., Oniye, S. J., Auta, J., Lakpini, C. A. and Abeke, F. O. 2016. “Growth Performance and Feed Utilization of Clarias gariepinus (Teugels) Fed Different Dietary Levels of Soaked Bauhinia monandra (Kutz) Seed Meal.” Journal of Food Research 5 (1): 97-106.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Ajayi Olusina Tunde, Ojo Samson Oluwagbemiga, Adeleke Babatunde, Oluyisola Olufemi Oluseyi. (2016). The Growth Performance of African Catfish (Clarias gariepinus) Fed Commercially Prepared Imported Fish Feeds. International Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1(3), 57-61. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20160103.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Ajayi Olusina Tunde; Ojo Samson Oluwagbemiga; Adeleke Babatunde; Oluyisola Olufemi Oluseyi. The Growth Performance of African Catfish (Clarias gariepinus) Fed Commercially Prepared Imported Fish Feeds. Int. J. Agric. Econ. 2016, 1(3), 57-61. doi: 10.11648/j.ijae.20160103.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Ajayi Olusina Tunde, Ojo Samson Oluwagbemiga, Adeleke Babatunde, Oluyisola Olufemi Oluseyi. The Growth Performance of African Catfish (Clarias gariepinus) Fed Commercially Prepared Imported Fish Feeds. Int J Agric Econ. 2016;1(3):57-61. doi: 10.11648/j.ijae.20160103.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijae.20160103.11,
  author = {Ajayi Olusina Tunde and Ojo Samson Oluwagbemiga and Adeleke Babatunde and Oluyisola Olufemi Oluseyi},
  title = {The Growth Performance of African Catfish (Clarias gariepinus) Fed Commercially Prepared Imported Fish Feeds},
  journal = {International Journal of Agricultural Economics},
  volume = {1},
  number = {3},
  pages = {57-61},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijae.20160103.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20160103.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijae.20160103.11},
  abstract = {The experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of different imported fish feeds on the performance of juvenile African Catfish (Clarias gariepinus). A-13 week feeding trial was conducted using 225 juveniles which were randomly assigned to five treatment groups in 15 indoor plastic tanks at a stocking rate of 15 fish per tank and three (3) replicates per treatment. The fish were fed at 5% body weight, twice daily. The five treatments were Coppens (T1), Aqua (T2), Ranna (T3), Pira (T4) and Durante (T5). Data for each parameter was subjected to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) while means of various results were compared at 5% level of significance. There were significant differences (PP<0.05) in the survival rates of the fish with the highest percentage in fish fed with Coppens (93.33%). A kilogram of Aqua and Pira feeds each cost $1.75 while the estimated costs of feeding one individual fish to a weight gain of 1kg using the same feeds were $2.78 and $3.73 respectively. Although, from this feeding trial, it is expensive to raise a kilogramme of fish using Pira fish feed, but due to the high survival rate, it is recommended for catfish production. It is assumed that the biomass harvested will make up for the cost incurred.},
 year = {2016}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - The Growth Performance of African Catfish (Clarias gariepinus) Fed Commercially Prepared Imported Fish Feeds
AU  - Ajayi Olusina Tunde
AU  - Ojo Samson Oluwagbemiga
AU  - Adeleke Babatunde
AU  - Oluyisola Olufemi Oluseyi
Y1  - 2016/08/06
PY  - 2016
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20160103.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijae.20160103.11
T2  - International Journal of Agricultural Economics
JF  - International Journal of Agricultural Economics
JO  - International Journal of Agricultural Economics
SP  - 57
EP  - 61
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2575-3843
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20160103.11
AB  - The experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of different imported fish feeds on the performance of juvenile African Catfish (Clarias gariepinus). A-13 week feeding trial was conducted using 225 juveniles which were randomly assigned to five treatment groups in 15 indoor plastic tanks at a stocking rate of 15 fish per tank and three (3) replicates per treatment. The fish were fed at 5% body weight, twice daily. The five treatments were Coppens (T1), Aqua (T2), Ranna (T3), Pira (T4) and Durante (T5). Data for each parameter was subjected to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) while means of various results were compared at 5% level of significance. There were significant differences (PP<0.05) in the survival rates of the fish with the highest percentage in fish fed with Coppens (93.33%). A kilogram of Aqua and Pira feeds each cost $1.75 while the estimated costs of feeding one individual fish to a weight gain of 1kg using the same feeds were $2.78 and $3.73 respectively. Although, from this feeding trial, it is expensive to raise a kilogramme of fish using Pira fish feed, but due to the high survival rate, it is recommended for catfish production. It is assumed that the biomass harvested will make up for the cost incurred.
VL  - 1
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Ajayi Olusina Tunde

Dept. of Fisheries Technology, Federal College of Animal Health and Production Technology, Ibadan, Nigeria
Ojo Samson Oluwagbemiga

Dept. of Wildlife and Ecotourism Management, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
Adeleke Babatunde

Dept. of Fisheries Technology, Federal College of Animal Health and Production Technology, Ibadan, Nigeria
Oluyisola Olufemi Oluseyi

Dept. of Wildlife and Ecotourism Management, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Ajayi Olusina Tunde, Ojo Samson Oluwagbemiga, Adeleke Babatunde, Oluyisola Olufemi Oluseyi. (2016). The Growth Performance of African Catfish (Clarias gariepinus) Fed Commercially Prepared Imported Fish Feeds. International Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1(3), 57-61. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20160103.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Ajayi Olusina Tunde; Ojo Samson Oluwagbemiga; Adeleke Babatunde; Oluyisola Olufemi Oluseyi. The Growth Performance of African Catfish (Clarias gariepinus) Fed Commercially Prepared Imported Fish Feeds. Int. J. Agric. Econ. 2016, 1(3), 57-61. doi: 10.11648/j.ijae.20160103.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Ajayi Olusina Tunde, Ojo Samson Oluwagbemiga, Adeleke Babatunde, Oluyisola Olufemi Oluseyi. The Growth Performance of African Catfish (Clarias gariepinus) Fed Commercially Prepared Imported Fish Feeds. Int J Agric Econ. 2016;1(3):57-61. doi: 10.11648/j.ijae.20160103.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijae.20160103.11,
  author = {Ajayi Olusina Tunde and Ojo Samson Oluwagbemiga and Adeleke Babatunde and Oluyisola Olufemi Oluseyi},
  title = {The Growth Performance of African Catfish (Clarias gariepinus) Fed Commercially Prepared Imported Fish Feeds},
  journal = {International Journal of Agricultural Economics},
  volume = {1},
  number = {3},
  pages = {57-61},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijae.20160103.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20160103.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijae.20160103.11},
  abstract = {The experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of different imported fish feeds on the performance of juvenile African Catfish (Clarias gariepinus). A-13 week feeding trial was conducted using 225 juveniles which were randomly assigned to five treatment groups in 15 indoor plastic tanks at a stocking rate of 15 fish per tank and three (3) replicates per treatment. The fish were fed at 5% body weight, twice daily. The five treatments were Coppens (T1), Aqua (T2), Ranna (T3), Pira (T4) and Durante (T5). Data for each parameter was subjected to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) while means of various results were compared at 5% level of significance. There were significant differences (PP<0.05) in the survival rates of the fish with the highest percentage in fish fed with Coppens (93.33%). A kilogram of Aqua and Pira feeds each cost $1.75 while the estimated costs of feeding one individual fish to a weight gain of 1kg using the same feeds were $2.78 and $3.73 respectively. Although, from this feeding trial, it is expensive to raise a kilogramme of fish using Pira fish feed, but due to the high survival rate, it is recommended for catfish production. It is assumed that the biomass harvested will make up for the cost incurred.},
 year = {2016}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - The Growth Performance of African Catfish (Clarias gariepinus) Fed Commercially Prepared Imported Fish Feeds
AU  - Ajayi Olusina Tunde
AU  - Ojo Samson Oluwagbemiga
AU  - Adeleke Babatunde
AU  - Oluyisola Olufemi Oluseyi
Y1  - 2016/08/06
PY  - 2016
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20160103.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijae.20160103.11
T2  - International Journal of Agricultural Economics
JF  - International Journal of Agricultural Economics
JO  - International Journal of Agricultural Economics
SP  - 57
EP  - 61
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2575-3843
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20160103.11
AB  - The experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of different imported fish feeds on the performance of juvenile African Catfish (Clarias gariepinus). A-13 week feeding trial was conducted using 225 juveniles which were randomly assigned to five treatment groups in 15 indoor plastic tanks at a stocking rate of 15 fish per tank and three (3) replicates per treatment. The fish were fed at 5% body weight, twice daily. The five treatments were Coppens (T1), Aqua (T2), Ranna (T3), Pira (T4) and Durante (T5). Data for each parameter was subjected to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) while means of various results were compared at 5% level of significance. There were significant differences (PP<0.05) in the survival rates of the fish with the highest percentage in fish fed with Coppens (93.33%). A kilogram of Aqua and Pira feeds each cost $1.75 while the estimated costs of feeding one individual fish to a weight gain of 1kg using the same feeds were $2.78 and $3.73 respectively. Although, from this feeding trial, it is expensive to raise a kilogramme of fish using Pira fish feed, but due to the high survival rate, it is recommended for catfish production. It is assumed that the biomass harvested will make up for the cost incurred.
VL  - 1
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download